The next major wave of digital banking growth is unlikely to come from customers choosing between increasingly sophisticated banking apps. It will come from people and businesses entering the digital financial system for the first time, often through a payment, a wallet or a small merchant transaction. That creates an unusual competitive dynamic: some of the institutions best positioned to reach these customers are local banks and financial providers that understand their communities but lack the scale, infrastructure and financial capacity of global competitors. The battle for financial inclusion may therefore be decided not by who builds the most advanced digital bank, but by whether smaller institutions can gain access to the same financial rails that increasingly determine who gets to participate in the digital economy.
Financial Inclusion Is Becoming an Infrastructure Question
For years, the financial inclusion debate has concentrated on access. Open more accounts, distribute more cards, build mobile banking applications and make financial services easier to reach. Those priorities remain important, but the challenge is becoming more complicated as banking moves deeper into digital infrastructure.
A customer may be able to open an account through a smartphone, but that account becomes considerably more useful when it can receive money instantly, make digital purchases, pay merchants, move funds across borders and connect with the wider financial ecosystem. Delivering those capabilities requires much more than an attractive mobile interface.
Banks need access to payment networks, settlement infrastructure, identity systems, fraud controls, cloud platforms and increasingly sophisticated compliance technology. Each layer carries technology costs, operational requirements and financial obligations. Large institutions can spread those costs across millions of customers and transactions. Smaller banks cannot always do the same.
This creates a risk that digitalisation could produce an unintended divide. Consumers may gain greater theoretical access to banking while the institutions serving them struggle to afford the infrastructure required to deliver competitive digital services.
Local Banks Have Something Technology Cannot Easily Replicate
Scale matters in banking, but so does proximity.
Local and regional financial institutions often understand customer behaviour, informal business practices and economic conditions that are difficult for an international provider to replicate from a centralised platform. They may already have relationships with small merchants, agricultural businesses, family enterprises and communities that remain partially outside formal financial services.
That distribution advantage becomes particularly valuable when financial inclusion moves beyond simply opening accounts.
A small merchant that begins accepting digital payments creates a transaction history. That history can eventually provide a bank with a clearer picture of revenue patterns, seasonality and cash flow. A financial institution that previously had limited information on the business may become better positioned to assess lending requirements, offer working capital or provide other financial products.
Payments therefore become an entry point rather than an end product. The institution processing the transaction gains an opportunity to build a broader financial relationship around it.
For emerging markets, that could make the ability of local banks to participate in modern payment ecosystems strategically important. If those institutions are excluded because the economics or financial requirements of participation are too demanding, much of the value created by digitalisation could migrate towards a relatively small number of larger platforms.
The Economics of Digital Banking Favour Scale
Technology has lowered many barriers to financial services, but it has not eliminated the economics of scale.
Modern banks are expected to provide cybersecurity, real-time fraud detection, digital identity, mobile services, APIs, data analytics, regulatory reporting and resilient infrastructure while simultaneously keeping transaction costs low. Artificial intelligence is adding another investment layer as institutions deploy increasingly sophisticated systems across customer service, fraud, risk and operations.
For a large bank, those investments can support millions of customers. For a smaller institution, the same capabilities may serve a fraction of that population while still requiring substantial infrastructure and compliance spending.
This is why the future of financial inclusion cannot be separated from the broader transformation of banking infrastructure. Cloud platforms, shared payment rails, Banking-as-a-Service models, interoperable networks and risk-sharing mechanisms can all reduce the amount of infrastructure individual institutions must build or finance independently.
The competitive question is increasingly becoming whether smaller institutions can access industrial-scale financial infrastructure without having to become industrial-scale banks themselves.
Payments Could Become the Gateway to a Much Larger Relationship
Digital payments have an important characteristic that makes them particularly powerful in emerging markets: frequency.
A customer may apply for a loan once every few years or purchase an insurance product occasionally, but payments happen continuously. Every grocery purchase, merchant sale, salary transfer or bill payment creates another interaction with the financial system.
That frequency gives payments enormous strategic value.
Once consumers and businesses begin transacting digitally, banks gain opportunities to understand financial behaviour that was previously hidden inside a cash economy. Transaction data can help institutions identify spending patterns, business revenues and financial needs, potentially creating the foundation for more sophisticated services.
For small businesses, the transition can be particularly significant. A merchant operating largely in cash may have a thriving business but limited financial documentation. Digital transactions gradually create a measurable financial footprint that could make the business easier to evaluate for credit and other banking products.
The expansion of digital payments is therefore not simply about replacing notes and coins. It can create the data infrastructure through which millions of previously difficult-to-assess customers become visible to the formal financial system.
But Inclusion Cannot Become Platform Dependence
There is another side to this transformation.
If digital financial infrastructure becomes concentrated among a small number of technology companies, payment networks or large banks, smaller institutions could become increasingly dependent on external platforms for critical services.
That dependence is not automatically negative. Shared infrastructure can dramatically reduce costs and accelerate innovation. The problem emerges when an institution has little negotiating power, limited portability or insufficient control over the systems that underpin its customer relationships.
Banks therefore face a delicate balance. They need partnerships to compete economically, but they also need enough control over customer data, risk management and service delivery to remain meaningful financial institutions rather than distribution channels for someone else’s infrastructure.
This challenge will become more pronounced as real-time and cross-border payments expand and financial services become increasingly interconnected. The institutions that succeed may not be those that own every layer of technology, but those that understand which layers are strategically important to control and which can safely be shared.
Financial Inclusion Is Moving Beyond the Bank Account
The industry’s definition of financial inclusion may ultimately need to change.
Counting bank accounts or issued cards provides an indication of access, but it says relatively little about whether people are actively participating in the digital economy. A dormant account does not create the same economic opportunity as a customer who can receive wages digitally, pay merchants, transfer money instantly and access credit based on an increasingly visible financial history.
The more meaningful measure may therefore become participation rather than access.
That shift has consequences for banks, governments, payment networks and development institutions. The objective is no longer simply to connect people to banking. It is to create an ecosystem in which those customers can transact frequently, safely and affordably enough for digital finance to become part of everyday economic activity.
For banks, the opportunity is substantial. Hundreds of millions of future digital banking relationships could begin with something as ordinary as a merchant accepting a digital payment for the first time.
Who ultimately owns the wider financial relationship that follows remains very much undecided.
What it means for the industry
- Financial inclusion is moving from an access problem to an infrastructure problem. Giving customers accounts is only the beginning if the institutions serving them cannot economically provide modern payment and digital banking capabilities.
- Local banks could remain critical to the next phase of digital growth because their customer relationships and market knowledge are difficult for global platforms to reproduce.
- Payments may become the primary gateway into formal finance, creating transaction histories that can support lending, savings and other financial products for previously underserved consumers and businesses.
- Shared infrastructure will become increasingly important as smaller institutions look for ways to access sophisticated payment, cloud, security and data capabilities without carrying the entire investment themselves.
- The strategic risk is excessive platform dependence. Banks will need to decide which parts of the financial relationship they must continue to control as more infrastructure is provided by external networks and technology partners.
- The real measure of financial inclusion may shift from accounts opened to economic participation, placing greater emphasis on active digital transactions, merchant acceptance and continued use of formal financial services.
Image Source: Pexels.com
